Having completed my series So Are You to My Thoughts,
and just now having re-read the series from beginning to end, I have some
thoughts on the kind of work it is. First and foremost, I believe they are
novels to live in. It might not even matter if you begin in the middle of the
series, and later go back to the beginning. You are going to find the
characters consistent, like people you might meet and then wonder about. “How
did Line and Stephen meet?” you ask. “Why does Paul move to Alaska?” or “Why
does Marty make poor choices?” In this case, you would be rewarded. Their
stories are there for all to see.
In addition, the novels exemplify what I think of as my
manifesto “against brilliance.” I have nothing against erudition, except when
it is a masquerade, when there are no clothes under the king’s ermine robe. One
does not need to go to an ivy league or big eight university to get an
excellent education. Education is more in one’s own hands. Art doesn’t need to
be larded with obfuscation and prizes. It needs to be meaningful. One doesn’t
need to learn code, finance or go to law school to find good work. Work in the
service of humans is everywhere. Glitz, glamour and fame are not how we should
measure our success. But in simpler ways, by the trust others have in us and
our fidelity to the lives and natures we have been given. By our ability to be
happy. And our country does not need to be the biggest cheese in the world,
saving other countries from themselves. Rather, we need to get back to our own
basics, spending money on education, health care and justice rather than on
armaments at every level.
None of us are perfect. Certainly my characters are not. But
their stories leave space for the reader to live among them. They show the
characters finding practices that fill them with delight and wonder: Paul
finding a way to live with loss in the heart of the country he loves most;
Marty finally learning to appreciate the beauty within herself and making a
home for a family which expresses it; Line having to tame her fierce maternal
energy into a watchful tolerance.
And they are stars, each with an epic story of their own
movement from a fixed childhood firmament into an expanding universe. Their own
dinner table conversations are thrilling, their houses and gardens are
beautiful and they are proud of the lives they lead.
The great anthropologist and poet Frederick Turner, in Beauty,
The Value of Values, published in 1991 imagines that the mid- 21st
century will be surprising to us, should we arrive there all of a sudden: We
would be “most surprised not by the expected innovations but by the way that
all of human cultural and biological history will have become part of the
landscape; by how magically corny, how shamefully old-fashioned, how
primate-like and tribal we will be among the almost invisible and intangible
miracles of our technology; by how slow and quiet everything will be, how
improvised, how richly ornamented; how closely we will live with the animals
and plants, how much in the open air; how gorgeously and formally and
anachronistically clothed we will be, how morally earnest and at the same time
how lighthearted, how accepting of shame and tragedy; how much also as we lived in the great pedestrian cities of the civilized past.”
I loved this vision of the future, so quiet and peaceful.
But we have far to go in that direction! Like Turner, I have written books
which state my own values, as over against those around me. Technology assists
me to assert them, whether anyone agrees or not. But one thing I can assure
you. The writer is dressed plainly, in cotton t-shirt, ragged jeans and tevas
on a warm day near the center of Los Angeles.